15Bad

Lagostina Review, Is Lagostina Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 1 graded product, Lagostina averages Bad (15/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

New Lagostina Nera Hard Anodized Nonstick 8.5IN Fry Pan

Lagostina

New Lagostina Nera Hard Anodized Nonstick 8.5IN Fry Pan

Hard anodized aluminum, nonstick coating type undisclosed

PFAS Grade15Bad
Overall Grade0Bad
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Hard anodizing reduces but does not eliminate aluminum migration, especially with acidic…

70
💨

Nonstick coating degradation and fume risk

Teflon-type coating-based nonstick coatings (common in this price tier) can decompose…

45
🍂

Coating flaking into food

Nonstick coatings can flake with age or mechanical damage. While small amounts of…

70

Nonstick coating type is unknown and Lagostina won't discuss PFAS.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →