40Poor

Mastrad Review, Is Mastrad Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 2 graded products, Mastrad averages Poor (40/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

Craft Smart Silicone Craft Mat

Mastrad

Craft Smart Silicone Craft Mat

silicone (gel-based)

Overall53Good
65/100
Good
⛏️

Silicone polymer leaching (low-molecular-weight oligomers)

Gel silicone can release trace cyclic oligomers into fatty foods at high heat. For…

70
💨

Thermal degradation and off-gassing

If overheated above manufacturer limits, silicone can emit odorous volatile compounds.…

70
⚠️

Bacterial contamination and biofilm growth

Silicone's porous microstructure can harbor bacteria if not dried thoroughly between…

70

Silicone craft mat carries minimal PFAS concern.

Risky category by default

Scrapbook.com Non-Stick Silicone Craft Mat

Mastrad

Scrapbook.com Non-Stick Silicone Craft Mat

Silicone

Overall11Bad
15/100
Bad
⚠️

Mold or bacterial growth from moisture retention

Silicone mats can trap moisture in creases or seams if stored wet or in humid conditions…

70

Silicone mats pose lower PFAS concern than coated cookware.

Nonstick, coating undisclosed

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →