25Poor

Sealpac Review, Is Sealpac Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 1 graded product, Sealpac averages Poor (25/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

Greaseproof Packaging Paper

Sealpac

Greaseproof Packaging Paper

Paper with grease-resistant coating, composition undisclosed

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade9Bad
🏷️

Coating composition undisclosed (general toxicity risk)

Grease-resistant paper coatings can include fluorochemicals (PFAS), silicones, or mineral…

70
🍳

Migration of coating into food (oleophilic contact)

Greaseproof coatings are designed to resist fatty substances, but this same property…

70

Thermal degradation (heat exposure)

Most synthetic food-contact coatings degrade above 60-80 degrees Celsius. If Sealpac…

70
🫧

Microplastics

If coating is plastic-based (polyethylene, polypropylene, or synthetic polymer), aging…

70

Avoid until the brand reveals its coating chemistry details.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →