25Poor

Systempak Review, Is Systempak Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 2 graded products, Systempak averages Poor (25/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

Peachy's BBQ Butcher Paper Roll

Systempak

Peachy's BBQ Butcher Paper Roll

paper with silicone coating or wax treatment

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
🍳

Coating composition uncertainty (silicone vs. wax type)

Systempak does not disclose whether the coating is food-grade silicone or specific wax…

70

Thermal breakdown of coating at high heat

If used in direct smoker contact or at sustained temperatures above 400F, coating…

70

Likely lower risk, but the coating source remains unknown.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Norpak Grease Resistant Paper Sheet - 12 x 12 Red

Systempak

Norpak Grease Resistant Paper Sheet - 12 x 12 Red

grease-resistant coated paper, coating unspecified

PFAS Grade25Poor
Overall Grade0Bad
♾️

PFAS

Grease-resistant paper coatings are a known vector for legacy PFAS (especially PFOA…

20
🍳

Coating migration into high-fat foods

Fluorinated or silicone coatings can migrate into fatty foods (oils, butter, cheese) more…

70

Thermal degradation and volatile release

Heating coated food paper (microwave, oven, or direct flame contact) can degrade…

70
🫧

Coating degradation and particulate shedding

Over time or with friction (crumpling, repeated use), grease-resistant coatings can flake…

70

Avoid until Norpak discloses what makes it grease-resistant.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →