Systempak · Grease-Resistant Butcher & Deli Paper
Norpak Grease Resistant Paper Sheet - 12 x 12 Red
Avoid until Norpak discloses what makes it grease-resistant.
Norpak's grease-resistant paper hides its coating type. Most grease-resistant food paper uses PFAS-based chemicals to repel oil and water.
The safe swap
Sam's Club
Member's Mark Heavy Duty Food Service Foil
70/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
grease-resistant coated paper, coating unspecified
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.
Category baseline
PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.
No PFAS disclosure
The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.
PFAS
Grease-resistant paper coatings are a known vector for legacy PFAS (especially PFOA, PFOS) and newer replacements (PFBS, GenX). Systempak's undisclosed formulation, combined with industry prevalence of PFAS in this application, makes PFAS presence statistically likely unless the brand has adopted and labeled a PFAS-free alternative.
Source: ATSDR ↗Coating migration into high-fat foods
Fluorinated or silicone coatings can migrate into fatty foods (oils, butter, cheese) more readily than into dry or acidic foods. No migration data is available for this specific product; risk depends entirely on the unknown coating chemistry and food contact time/temperature.
Thermal degradation and volatile release
Heating coated food paper (microwave, oven, or direct flame contact) can degrade polymeric coatings and release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or fluorinated gases. This product is labeled for food contact but carries no heat-use guidance; misuse during cooking increases inhalation and ingestion risk.
Coating degradation and particulate shedding
Over time or with friction (crumpling, repeated use), grease-resistant coatings can flake or shed microscopic particles into food. With an unverified coating formula and no durability claims, the rate and safety profile of shedding are unknown.
What’s reassuring
Recycling contamination and downstream exposure
PFAS-coated paper entering recycling streams contaminates new paper and wastewater. Systempak provides no information on whether this product is recyclable or how its coating affects end-of-life disposal; assume it is destined for landfill or incineration.
The full breakdown
What it's made of and why it matters
This product is paper coated with an unspecified grease-resistant formulation. Grease resistance in food packaging is typically achieved through fluorinated compounds (PFAS) or, less commonly, wax or silicone coatings. Because Systempak does not disclose the coating type or chemistry, you cannot verify whether PFAS, legacy Teflon-family coating, or safer alternatives were used. The coating is the entire safety profile here; uncoated paper would pose no chemical hazard, but the coating's identity is hidden.
The brand's record and disclosure
Systempak maintains no publicly available disclosure on coating materials, certifications, or PFAS policy for this product line. No third-party safety certifications (such as FDA compliance statements or GOTS/OEKO-TEX equivalents for food packaging) are evident in accessible product documentation. The brand's silence on a known, contentious ingredient class signals either lack of transparency infrastructure or absence of differentiation from industry-standard PFAS formulations.
How it compares in its category
Most grease-resistant food papers still rely on PFAS-based coatings because they remain cost-effective and durable. Some manufacturers (e.g., Footprint, certain certified compostable paper brands) now market PFAS-free or PFAS-disclosed alternatives, though at higher cost. Norpak's lack of marketing around coating safety, combined with its commodity positioning, suggests this product likely contains legacy PFAS compounds rather than newer replacements. Transparency leaders in this category disclose coating type or carry third-party certification; Systempak does neither here.
If you buy it
If you proceed despite uncertainty, use this product only for ambient or cold storage (not microwave or oven heating, which may degrade the coating and release volatiles). Replace sheets after visible wear or staining, as coating damage increases leaching risk. Do not use for high-fat foods stored longer than a few hours. Consider this a short-term, single-use product; do not reuse or rinse and store. Switching to uncoated parchment, certified PFAS-free greaseproof paper, or glass/silicone storage alternatives eliminates this chemical risk entirely.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Systempak has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Safer alternatives in Grease-Resistant Butcher & Deli Paper
Sam's Club
Member's Mark Heavy Duty Food Service Foil
Aluminum foil
Aluminum leaching from acidic foods
Limited concern
Lower risk. Plain aluminum foil typically does not contain PFAS.
⚠Risky category by default
Sam's Club
Idl Packaging White Butcher Paper 18" x 12000" Natural Butcher Paper Roll for Meat and Fish
unbleached natural kraft paper
Grease and mineral oil migration
Limited concern
Lower risk. Uncoated paper rarely contains PFAS chemicals.
⚠Risky category by default
IDL Packaging PFAS-Free Grease-Proof Paper Sheets
paper with grease-resistant coating
PFAS
Limited concern
Microplastic shedding from coating under wear
Limited concern
Brand claims PFAS-free but lacks independent lab verification.
⚠Waterproof or stain-proof treatment
More grease-resistant butcher & deli paper grades
How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.