Monofilament vs 400 LC Trolling Reel, Line Counter & Bait Clicker: which is safer?

Ande Monofilament is the clear pick. Piscifun 400 LC Trolling Reel, Line Counter & Bait Clicker carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Ande Monofilament

Ande

Monofilament

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 81/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Monofilament nylon fishing line

Confidence

72%

PossibleMicroplastic shedding during use

Piscifun 400 LC Trolling Reel, Line Counter & Bait Clicker

Piscifun

400 LC Trolling Reel, Line Counter & Bait Clicker

PFAS grade

Good 50/100

Overall grade

Poor 28/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Metal spool, gears, and unspecified coatings

Confidence

35%

PossibleCoating leachables (unidentified heavy metals from plating or paint)

ReportedCorrosion-driven coating failure and exposed raw metal

PossibleNickel dermal contact from handle and spool

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Microplastic shedding during use on the Ande and not on the Piscifun.
  • We flag Coating leachables (unidentified heavy metals from plating or paint), Corrosion-driven coating failure and exposed raw metal, Nickel dermal contact from handle and spool and Microplastic or paint particle shedding from worn coatings on the Piscifun and not on the Ande.
  • The Ande is Monofilament nylon fishing line where the Piscifun is Metal spool, gears, and unspecified coatings, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 35 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Ande is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Piscifun grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More fishing line: see the full ranking