Monofilament vs 400 LC Trolling Reel, Line Counter & Bait Clicker: which is safer?
Ande Monofilament is the clear pick. Piscifun 400 LC Trolling Reel, Line Counter & Bait Clicker carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Ande
Monofilament
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleMicroplastic shedding during use
Piscifun
400 LC Trolling Reel, Line Counter & Bait Clicker
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleCoating leachables (unidentified heavy metals from plating or paint)
ReportedCorrosion-driven coating failure and exposed raw metal
PossibleNickel dermal contact from handle and spool
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Microplastic shedding during use on the Ande and not on the Piscifun.
- We flag Coating leachables (unidentified heavy metals from plating or paint), Corrosion-driven coating failure and exposed raw metal, Nickel dermal contact from handle and spool and Microplastic or paint particle shedding from worn coatings on the Piscifun and not on the Ande.
- The Ande is Monofilament nylon fishing line where the Piscifun is Metal spool, gears, and unspecified coatings, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 35 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Ande is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Piscifun grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More fishing line: see the full ranking