Lip Power Long-Lasting Lipstick vs BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss: which is safer?
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss is the clear pick. Armani Beauty Lip Power Long-Lasting Lipstick carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Armani Beauty
Lip Power Long-Lasting Lipstick
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleSynthetic fragrance allergens and undisclosed aromatics
PossiblePolymeric binder degradation and microparticle shedding
PossibleContact irritation from cumulative lip exposure
Our pick
Becca Cosmetics
BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Synthetic fragrance allergens and undisclosed aromatics, Polymeric binder degradation and microparticle shedding, Contact irritation from cumulative lip exposure and PFAS in waterproofing system (established hazard class, not graded here) on the Armani Beauty and not on the Becca Cosmetics.
- We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components on the Becca Cosmetics and not on the Armani Beauty.
- The Armani Beauty is Wax, oils, pigments, polymeric binders (composition unspecified) where the Becca Cosmetics is Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Becca Cosmetics is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Armani Beauty grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More lip balm & long-wear lipstick: see the full ranking