Miracle Volume Conditioner vs Pro-V Daily Moisture Renewal Conditioner: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Aussie
Miracle Volume Conditioner
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
water-based conditioner, polymeric conditioning agents
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitizers
PossiblePolymeric conditioning agent buildup
Pantene
Pro-V Daily Moisture Renewal Conditioner
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
aqueous conditioning cream; typical surfactants, silicones, emollients
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens
PossibleSilicone buildup (cosmetic, not toxicological)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens and sensitizers and Polymeric conditioning agent buildup on the Aussie and not on the Pantene.
- We flag Fragrance allergens and Silicone buildup (cosmetic, not toxicological) on the Pantene and not on the Aussie.
- The Aussie is water-based conditioner, polymeric conditioning agents where the Pantene is aqueous conditioning cream; typical surfactants, silicones, emollients, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More conditioner: see the full ranking