Becca Ultimate Color Gloss Malibu Punch Lot of 3 x (7ml / 0.2fl.oz) vs BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss: which is safer?

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Becca Ultimate Color Gloss Malibu Punch Lot of 3 x (7ml / 0.2fl.oz)

Becca Cosmetics

Becca Ultimate Color Gloss Malibu Punch Lot of 3 x (7ml / 0.2fl.oz)

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

liquid color gloss (pigments, oils, resins in standard cosmetic base)

Confidence

72%

Possible1,4-dioxane (contaminant in emulsifiers and surfactants)

PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components

PossibleBacterial contamination from applicator or storage

Our pick

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

Becca Cosmetics

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 71/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss)

Confidence

78%

PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag 1,4-dioxane (contaminant in emulsifiers and surfactants) and Bacterial contamination from applicator or storage on the Becca Cosmetics and not on the Becca Cosmetics.
  • Both carry a flag for Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components, so neither choice avoids it.
  • The Becca Cosmetics is liquid color gloss (pigments, oils, resins in standard cosmetic base) where the Becca Cosmetics is Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More lip balm & long-wear lipstick: see the full ranking