BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss vs Bonne Bell Lip Smacker Original & Best Party Pack: which is safer?

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

Becca Cosmetics

BECCA x Chrissy Teigen Glow Gloss

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 71/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss)

Confidence

78%

PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components

Bonne Bell Lip Smacker Original & Best Party Pack

Lip Smacker

Bonne Bell Lip Smacker Original & Best Party Pack

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

wax, oils, and pigments in lipstick form

Confidence

72%

PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

PossibleContamination or microbial growth in multi-use pack format

PossibleIrritation or allergic reaction to mineral oil or wax base

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components on the Becca Cosmetics and not on the Lip Smacker.
  • We flag Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components, Contamination or microbial growth in multi-use pack format and Irritation or allergic reaction to mineral oil or wax base on the Lip Smacker and not on the Becca Cosmetics.
  • The Becca Cosmetics is Glycerin, silicones, pigments, film-formers (typical liquid cosmetic gloss) where the Lip Smacker is wax, oils, and pigments in lipstick form, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More lip balm & long-wear lipstick: see the full ranking