Women's Regular Soft Pads vs Chlorine Free Maxi Pads: which is safer?
Seventh Generation Chlorine Free Maxi Pads is the clear pick. Bodyform Women's Regular Soft Pads carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Bodyform
Women's Regular Soft Pads
PFAS grade
Poor 25/100
Overall grade
Bad 13/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Cotton/wood pulp core with waterproof synthetic backing (unspecified polymer)
Confidence
35%
PossiblePFAS in waterproof backing
PossibleUnspecified synthetic polymer additives
PossibleSkin contact irritation or sensitization
Our pick
Seventh Generation
Chlorine Free Maxi Pads
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 96/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
organic cotton, wood pulp
Confidence
78%
PossibleFragrance allergen content
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in waterproof backing, Unspecified synthetic polymer additives and Skin contact irritation or sensitization on the Bodyform and not on the Seventh Generation.
- We flag Fragrance allergen content on the Seventh Generation and not on the Bodyform.
- The Bodyform is Cotton/wood pulp core with waterproof synthetic backing (unspecified polymer) where the Seventh Generation is organic cotton, wood pulp, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 75 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Seventh Generation is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Bodyform grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More period pads: see the full ranking