Piaro Touring Jacket Men vs Women's Untracked Jacket: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Bogner Piaro Touring Jacket Men

Bogner

Piaro Touring Jacket Men

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Polyamide/nylon blend with water-repellent coating finish

Confidence

35%

Likelywater-repellent coating (undisclosed chemistry)

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in dyes and finishes

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metals in pigments

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

PFAS grade

Poor 35/100

Overall grade

Bad 17/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

Confidence

42%

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating finish

ReportedMicroplastics shedding from polyester

PossibleCoating degradation and leaching

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR coating (undisclosed chemistry), Formaldehyde resins in dyes and finishes, Azo dyes and heavy metals in pigments and Polyamide degradation and microfiber release on the Bogner and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag PFAS in DWR finish, Microplastics shedding from polyester and Coating degradation and leaching on the Patagonia and not on the Bogner.
  • The Bogner is Polyamide/nylon blend with DWR finish where the Patagonia is recycled polyester with DWR treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More ski & snowboard jackets: see the full ranking