PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Bogner Piaro Touring Jacket Men

Bogner · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Bogner Piaro Touring Jacket Men

Bad

Premium ski jacket with unknown water-repellent coating treatment; PFAS disclosure lacking.

Verdict: SkipPolyamide ski jacket with undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry and absent brand transparency; manageable if laundered carefully, but PFAS exposure risk and lack of certifications warrant cautious use.

Bogner Piaro is a high-end touring jacket using polyamide with water-repellent coating, but the brand discloses nothing about PFAS chemistry. water-repellent coating treatments commonly contain fluorinated compounds; verification unavailable.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyamide/nylon blend with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🏷️

water-repellent coating (undisclosed chemistry)

Bogner does not specify whether the Piaro's water-repellent coating is legacy PFAS-based, short-chain PFAS, or non-fluorinated. Given the brand's silence and the jacket's premium positioning (suggesting durability focus), a PFAS-containing treatment remains plausible. water-repellent coating coatings can shed microparticles during washing and wear.

20/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No published data on formaldehyde levels in this specific model. Polyamide fabrics can incorporate formaldehyde-releasing resins in dyeing and finishing processes; the absence of OEKO-TEX or similar certification means no independent verification of residual formaldehyde content.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Bogner's color palette for the Piaro (typically dark technical shades) does not trigger obvious concern, but no public information confirms restricted substance testing. Premium brands sometimes use safer dye chemistry, but without certification, this cannot be assumed.

Source: FDA
70/ 100

Polyamide degradation and microfiber release

Nylon fabrics shed microfibers during washing and wear; this is an established property of the material class, not brand-specific. Washing less frequently and using cold, gentle cycles minimizes shedding but does not eliminate it.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Antimony in polyester blend components

If any polyester is present in the blend, antimony use as a catalyst is standard; Bogner does not disclose the exact polyamide/synthetic ratio. This is a minor concern for outerwear because antimony is not readily leached during normal wear or laundering.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Piaro Touring Jacket uses a polyamide (nylon) blend, a synthetic polymer chosen for lightweight durability and water resistance in high-performance outerwear. The critical concern is the water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric surface. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on long-chain PFAS chemicals, which persist in the environment and bioaccumulate; modern alternatives exist but Bogner does not publicly specify which treatment this jacket uses. Polyamide itself is stable and does not leach chemicals during normal wear, but the finish is the unknown variable.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bogner, a premium German outerwear manufacturer, has not published clear statements on PFAS phase-out timelines or water-repellent coating sourcing transparency for this product line. The brand does not list certifications such as bluesign or OEKO-TEX 100 for the Piaro Touring Jacket, which would independently verify chemical inputs. This silence on a known category risk for technical apparel is a red flag in an era where competitors (Arc'teryx, Patagonia) increasingly disclose or eliminate PFAS-based water treatments. No major safety recalls or contamination incidents are publicly documented for this specific model.

How it compares in its category

Premium ski and touring jackets typically face a trade-off between water repellency and chemical transparency. Bogner's lack of disclosure places this jacket below brands offering PFAS-free water-repellent coating (such as Patagonia's Paragon Shells or Arc'teryx Therme with wax-based finishes) but on par with many mainstream technical jackets that also remain silent on water-repellent coating chemistry. At its price point (USD 600+), absence of third-party certification or brand transparency is a competitive disadvantage versus certified alternatives at similar cost.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently in cool water with minimal detergent to preserve the water-repellent coating finish and reduce microfiber shedding; avoid hot water and machine drying, which can degrade the coating. Do not use dry-cleaning, which employs harsh solvents. If the water-repellent finish degrades noticeably (water no longer beads), do not retreated it yourself with consumer water-repellent coating sprays (often high-PFAS); instead, retire the jacket or contact Bogner for professional re-treatment information. Store in a breathable bag away from direct heat and UV light to extend the life of both the nylon and finish.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bogner has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.