Staple x Brooks Cascadia 1 men vs Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes: which is safer?

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Staple x Brooks Cascadia 1 men

Brooks

Staple x Brooks Cascadia 1 men

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Mesh/textile upper with synthetic waterproof treatment, rubber sole

Confidence

45%

PossibleAzo dyes and synthetic textile finishing

Reportedwater-repellent coating composition (PFAS or alternatives)

PossibleFormaldehyde releasers in adhesives and linings

Our pick

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

New Balance

Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and color-based toxins

PossibleAntimony in polyester

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and synthetic textile finishing, DWR coating composition (PFAS or alternatives), Formaldehyde releasers in adhesives and linings and Microfiber shedding from synthetic upper on the Brooks and not on the New Balance.
  • We flag Azo dyes and color-based toxins and Antimony in polyester on the New Balance and not on the Brooks.
  • The Brooks is Mesh/textile upper with synthetic waterproof treatment, rubber sole where the New Balance is Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the New Balance is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Brooks grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More running & athletic shoes: see the full ranking