Women's Leslie Parka vs Women's Untracked Jacket: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Canada Goose Women's Leslie Parka

Canada Goose

Women's Leslie Parka

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 8/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Down-filled parka with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treated shell

Confidence

45%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in synthetic shell or lining

PossibleDown dust and allergen exposure

PossibleSynthetic shell off-gassing (VOCs)

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

PFAS grade

Poor 35/100

Overall grade

Bad 17/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

Confidence

42%

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating finish

ReportedMicroplastics shedding from polyester

PossibleCoating degradation and leaching

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Formaldehyde resins in synthetic shell or lining, Down dust and allergen exposure and Synthetic shell off-gassing (VOCs) on the Canada Goose and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag PFAS in DWR finish, Microplastics shedding from polyester and Coating degradation and leaching on the Patagonia and not on the Canada Goose.
  • The Canada Goose is Down-filled parka with durable water-repellent (DWR) treated shell where the Patagonia is recycled polyester with DWR treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More ski & snowboard jackets: see the full ranking