Ceramic Baking Sheet vs WearGuard Half-Size Non-Stick Sheet Pan S5303: which is safer?

Caraway Ceramic Baking Sheet is the clear pick. Vollrath WearGuard Half-Size Non-Stick Sheet Pan S5303 carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Caraway Ceramic Baking Sheet

Caraway

Ceramic Baking Sheet

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

not stated

Confidence

80%

PossibleCoating degradation and metal substrate exposure

PossibleAluminum substrate leaching (if aluminum core)

PossibleThermal shock and coating fracturing

Vollrath WearGuard Half-Size Non-Stick Sheet Pan S5303

Vollrath

WearGuard Half-Size Non-Stick Sheet Pan S5303

PFAS grade

Bad 15/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Aluminum sheet with unspecified non-stick coating

Confidence

35%

PossibleTeflon-type coating thermal degradation (fume risk)

LikelyCoating degradation and particle ingestion

ReportedCoating material identity (undisclosed)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Coating degradation and metal substrate exposure, Aluminum substrate leaching (if aluminum core) and Thermal shock and coating fracturing on the Caraway and not on the Vollrath.
  • We flag PTFE thermal degradation (fume risk), Coating degradation and particle ingestion and Coating material identity (undisclosed) on the Vollrath and not on the Caraway.
  • The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Caraway is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Vollrath grade, at 35% confidence against 80%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More bakeware: see the full ranking