Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt vs x Hyrox Move Women's Bra: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

100% cotton jersey knit, untreated

Confidence

78%

PossibleAzo dyes

PossibleMicrofiber shedding

PUMA x Hyrox Move Women's Bra

Puma

x Hyrox Move Women's Bra

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Nylon, spandex blend athletic fabric

Confidence

68%

PossibleMicroplastic shedding during laundering

PossibleAllergic contact dermatitis from dyes or finishes

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and Microfiber shedding on the Carhartt and not on the Puma.
  • We flag Microplastic shedding during laundering and Allergic contact dermatitis from dyes or finishes on the Puma and not on the Carhartt.
  • The Carhartt is 100% cotton jersey knit, untreated where the Puma is Nylon, spandex blend athletic fabric, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof sports undergarments: see the full ranking