PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall57/ 100Good
PUMA x Hyrox Move Women's Bra

Puma · Waterproof Sports Undergarments

PUMA x Hyrox Move Women's Bra

Good

Lower risk. Standard athletic bra without water-repellent features.

Verdict · SkipNylon-spandex athletic bra with no established hazard record; standard construction; PUMA lacks transparency but no recalls or formaldehyde/dye concerns documented.

A nylon and spandex sports bra without water-resistant or stain-resistant finishes typically associated with PFAS. Puma hasn't disclosed PFAS information.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon, spandex blend athletic fabric

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding during laundering

All synthetic textiles, including nylon-spandex, shed microfibers with washing. Athletic bras with high elastic content may shed more than plain woven shirts. Frequency and volume are typical for the product type, not exceptional risk.

70/ 100
⚠️

Allergic contact dermatitis from dyes or finishes

Individuals with textile dye sensitivity or contact dermatitis may react to untested dye chemistry. PUMA's lack of hypoallergenic or sensitivity certifications means no pre-screening for reactive dyes is available to consumers.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or testing data published for PUMA athletic bras. Formaldehyde use in textile finishing has declined industry-wide, but PUMA provides no chemical disclosure to confirm absence in this product.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes (potential allergenic or carcinogenic intermediates)

No specific hazard alerts exist for PUMA x Hyrox bras. Restricted azo dyes are banned in EU textiles, but PUMA does not publish restricted substances data for retail markets, leaving compliance status unconfirmed.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Lead and cadmium in synthetic dyes are rare but unaudited in mainstream apparel. PUMA provides no third-party chemical testing data for this bra, so heavy metal content is not publicly verified.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This bra uses nylon and spandex, the industry standard for athletic wear. Nylon is a synthetic polyamide that does not leach heavy metals or BPA when worn against skin. Spandex (elastane) adds stretch and recovery; neither fiber releases concerning chemicals during normal wear. The blend is durable and unlikely to shed microplastics unless abraded heavily or washed in ways that degrade fibers.

The brand's record and disclosure

PUMA does not publicly disclose chemical testing, restricted substances lists, or third-party certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or GOTS) for this specific product. The brand has no major recalls related to formaldehyde, azo dyes, or heavy metals in apparel as of available records. This silence on supply-chain transparency is typical for mainstream athletic brands but limits confidence in dye and finish safety assurance.

How it compares in its category

Nylon-spandex blends are the norm in athletic bras across all price points. This construction avoids added antimony (sometimes used to make polyester more flame-resistant) and heavy elastic reinforcement, which present different chemical concerns. Independent certifications (absent here) are what differentiate premium athletic wear; this product sits in the unaudited mainstream tier.

If you buy it

Wash in cold or warm water (not hot) to preserve spandex elasticity and reduce microfiber shedding. Avoid chlorine bleach and fabric softeners, which can degrade the fibers. Line-dry or tumble on low heat; high heat accelerates synthetic fiber degradation. Replace after 3-5 years or when elastic loses recovery, as worn spandex is more prone to fiber breakdown during washing.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 68% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Puma has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof sports undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.