Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt vs Men's Stride Performance Long Sleeve Shirt: which is safer?

Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Carhartt Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

Carhartt

Men's Force Relaxed Fit Short-Sleeve Pocket T-Shirt

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

100% cotton jersey knit, untreated

Confidence

78%

PossibleAzo dyes

PossibleMicrofiber shedding

Reebok Men's Stride Performance Long Sleeve Shirt

Reebok

Men's Stride Performance Long Sleeve Shirt

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 37/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Polyester blend performance fabric

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde releasers in textile finishing

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metals in colorants

ReportedSkin irritation from dye and finish residues

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and Microfiber shedding on the Carhartt and not on the Reebok.
  • We flag Formaldehyde releasers in textile finishing, Azo dyes and heavy metals in colorants, Skin irritation from dye and finish residues and Microfiber shedding during wear and wash on the Reebok and not on the Carhartt.
  • The Carhartt is 100% cotton jersey knit, untreated where the Reebok is Polyester blend performance fabric, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof sports undergarments: see the full ranking