PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall37/ 100Poor
Reebok Men's Stride Performance Long Sleeve Shirt

Reebok · Waterproof Sports Undergarments

Reebok Men's Stride Performance Long Sleeve Shirt

Good

Standard athletic shirt, no known PFAS risk signals detected.

Verdict · SkipPolyester performance shirt with no established safety red flags; standard athletic wear with typical care practices mitigates minor textile hazards.

Basic polyester performance apparel with no reported water-repellent or stain-resistant treatment. Reebok hasn't disclosed PFAS information, and standard athletic fabrics typically pose lower concern unless treated.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester blend performance fabric

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Reebok Men's Stride Sleeve Shirt is made of, ingredients and materials

This shirt is a polyester blend, likely 100% polyester or polyester with elastane/spandex for stretch. Polyester is a synthetic polymer that does not biodegrade but is stable and does not leach chemicals under normal wearing conditions. Performance fabrics like this are often treated with finishes for moisture-wicking and durability, which may include dyes and processing agents. The key risk factors in polyester textiles are residual chemicals from manufacturing (formaldehyde resins, dyes, and dye auxiliaries) that can transfer to skin if not adequately rinsed during production.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Performance polyester fabrics often use formaldehyde-based resins for wrinkle resistance, shrink control, and durability. No recall or complaint on record for this specific product, but residual levels are typical in new athletic wear until laundering removes them.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Polyester requires metal-containing dyes for color fastness. Black and dark colors carry higher risk for azo dye residues and trace heavy metals (lead, cadmium, copper). No testing data is public for this Reebok product; compliance is assumed under standard apparel regulations.

Source, FDA ↗
70/ 100
🎨

Skin irritation from dye and finish residues

New polyester garments can cause mild dermatitis or irritation in sensitive individuals due to uncleaned dyes and finishing agents. This is reversible with pre-wash and is not specific to Reebok but common across the category.

45/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during wear and wash

Polyester sheds microfibers during washing, contributing to aquatic microplastic pollution. This is an environmental rather than direct consumer hazard but is relevant to the material choice. Not specific to this brand but inherent to synthetic textiles.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony is used as a catalyst in polyester synthesis and may persist in trace amounts in the finished fiber. Regulatory limits are set, and no specific antimony concerns have been documented for Reebok athletic wear.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Reebok (owned by Authentic Brands Group, formerly Adidas-owned) maintains product safety compliance with standard apparel regulations but does not publicly disclose detailed chemical testing or restricted substance lists for individual products. The brand has not faced major chemical safety recalls for athletic wear in recent years. No established pattern of transparency on formaldehyde, azo dyes, or heavy metal content in colorants has been documented for this product line. Like most mainstream athletic brands, Reebok operates under standard industry compliance but does not voluntarily exceed regulatory minimums in public disclosure.

How it compares in its category

This shirt falls into the mainstream athletic performance market alongside Nike, Adidas, and Under Armour products. Most polyester performance wear carries similar low-level risks from dyes and finishes, with no meaningful safety differentiation within this tier. Brands with third-party certifications (bluesign, OEKO-TEX) provide additional assurance, but Reebok does not highlight such certifications for this product. For a basic polyester athletic shirt, this represents standard risk profile rather than best-in-class or concerning.

If you buy it

Wash before first wear to remove excess dyes and processing residues, using cool to warm water. Avoid prolonged skin contact with a new, unwashed shirt, as dyes and formaldehyde releasers used in finishing can irritate sensitive skin. Polyester does not tolerate high heat; dry on low heat or air dry to prevent degradation and off-gassing. Replace the shirt if seams begin to break down, pilling becomes severe, or any chemical odor persists after multiple washes, as these indicate coating or fiber degradation.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Reebok has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More waterproof sports undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.