CAVITY PROTECTION TOOTHPASTE vs Fluoride-Free Antiplaque Whitening Toothpaste: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

COLGATE CAVITY PROTECTION TOOTHPASTE

Colgate

CAVITY PROTECTION TOOTHPASTE

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 71/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

aqueous gel with fluoride, silica, sorbitol, cellulose

Confidence

78%

PossibleFluoride ingestion (systemic dose risk)

Tom's of Maine Fluoride-Free Antiplaque Whitening Toothpaste

Tom's of Maine

Fluoride-Free Antiplaque Whitening Toothpaste

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 71/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Glycerin, calcium carbonate, silica, natural flavoring, gum base (typical toothpaste formula)

Confidence

72%

PossibleFragrance or flavoring allergens

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Fluoride ingestion (systemic dose risk) on the Colgate and not on the Tom's of Maine.
  • We flag Fragrance or flavoring allergens on the Tom's of Maine and not on the Colgate.
  • The Colgate is aqueous gel with fluoride, silica, sorbitol, cellulose where the Tom's of Maine is Glycerin, calcium carbonate, silica, natural flavoring, gum base (typical toothpaste formula), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More toothpaste: see the full ranking