All Day Crew Tee Women vs Women's Raquel High Waist Flare: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Cotton On
All Day Crew Tee Women
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
cotton
Confidence
78%
PossibleAzo dyes and azo metabolites
PossibleHeavy metals in synthetic dyes (lead, cadmium, chromium)
Splits59
Women's Raquel High Waist Flare
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 57/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
nylon/spandex blend athletic leggings
Confidence
72%
PossibleAzo dyes (synthetic colorants)
PossibleSpandex degradation and microfiber shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes and azo metabolites and Heavy metals in synthetic dyes (lead, cadmium, chromium) on the Cotton On and not on the Splits59.
- We flag Azo dyes (synthetic colorants) and Spandex degradation and microfiber shedding on the Splits59 and not on the Cotton On.
- The Cotton On is cotton where the Splits59 is nylon/spandex blend athletic leggings, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More activewear: see the full ranking