Stik Cast Iron Seasoning vs Grill Master No-Stick Cooking Spray: which is safer?

Stik Cast Iron Seasoning is the clear pick. Crisco Grill Master No-Stick Cooking Spray carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Crisbee

Stik Cast Iron Seasoning

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 77/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Organic waxes and oils blend

Confidence

78%

PossibleOil rancidity and off-gassing

PossibleAllergen risk from plant oils

Crisco Grill Master No-Stick Cooking Spray

Crisco

Grill Master No-Stick Cooking Spray

PFAS grade

Bad 15/100

Overall grade

Bad 3/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

propellant spray with unspecified nonstick coating

Confidence

35%

PossibleTeflon-type coating thermal degradation / fume inhalation risk

PossibleCoating degradation and ingestion of microparticles

PossibleSilicone residue accumulation (if silicone-based coating)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Oil rancidity and off-gassing and Allergen risk from plant oils on the Crisbee and not on the Crisco.
  • We flag PTFE thermal degradation / fume inhalation risk, Coating degradation and ingestion of microparticles and Silicone residue accumulation (if silicone-based coating) on the Crisco and not on the Crisbee.
  • The Crisbee is Organic waxes and oils blend where the Crisco is propellant spray with unspecified nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Crisbee is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Crisco grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More cast iron cookware seasoning & oil: see the full ranking