ECO-Takeout Single Entree Food Container EC-08 (Jade) vs Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers: which is safer?

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

ECO-Takeout Single Entree Food Container EC-08 (Jade)

Footprint (EarthBox line)

ECO-Takeout Single Entree Food Container EC-08 (Jade)

PFAS grade

Good 70/100

Overall grade

Good 66/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Molded fiber (post-consumer waste) with water-based coating

Confidence

78%

PossibleMicrobial growth or mold if reused or stored wet

Our pick

World Centric Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

World Centric

Compostable Fiber Compost-A-Pak Containers

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Good 74/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating

Confidence

78%

PossibleProprietary coating chemical migration

PossibleMoisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix

ReportedCoating degradation under heat or fatty foods

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Microbial growth or mold if reused or stored wet on the Footprint (EarthBox line) and not on the World Centric.
  • We flag Proprietary coating chemical migration, Moisture and microbial growth in fiber matrix, Coating degradation under heat or fatty foods and Recycling contamination if misdisposed on the World Centric and not on the Footprint (EarthBox line).
  • The Footprint (EarthBox line) is Molded fiber (post-consumer waste) with water-based coating where the World Centric is Fiber-based (wood pulp/molded fiber), compostable coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 30 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the World Centric is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More food packaging: see the full ranking