Men's Quick Dry & Moisture Wicking 360 Stretch Performance Boxer Briefs vs Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack: which is safer?
Reebok Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Fruit of the Loom
Men's Quick Dry & Moisture Wicking 360 Stretch Performance Boxer Briefs
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Polyester/nylon blend with moisture-wicking treatment
Confidence
52%
PossiblePFAS in moisture-wicking finish
LikelyMicroplastic shedding from synthetic fibers
Our pick
Reebok
Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 53/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
nylon, spandex, cotton blend
Confidence
72%
PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing
PossibleAzo dyes
PossibleElastomer degradation (spandex breakdown)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in moisture-wicking finish and Microplastic shedding from synthetic fibers on the Fruit of the Loom and not on the Reebok.
- We flag Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing, Azo dyes and Elastomer degradation (spandex breakdown) on the Reebok and not on the Fruit of the Loom.
- The Fruit of the Loom is Polyester/nylon blend with moisture-wicking treatment where the Reebok is nylon, spandex, cotton blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Reebok is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More sports performance undergarments: see the full ranking