Non-Toxic Sports Performance Undergarments, ranked by PFAS grade

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What we found
All 85 sports performance undergarments PFAS Authority has graded score below its 70 point pass mark for PFAS and other toxins, as of October 2026.

The full ranking is below, best-graded first, with every score linking to the evidence behind it. Nothing here clears our buy threshold yet, so the least-concerning options come first.

Are sports performance undergarments safe?

None of the 85 sports performance undergarments we graded come back low-concern on our screen. Our grades are model-based assessments built from published materials, ingredient lists, certifications and brand disclosures, not laboratory tests, so they say what we can evidence rather than that anything is safe.

Best graded sports performance undergarments here

  1. 1PUMA Women's Quarter Crew Socks (6 Pairs) 65 out of 100
  2. 2Brooks Brothers Men's 3-Pack Cotton Boxers 65 out of 100
  3. 3Brooks Brothers Men's Supima Cotton Boxer Briefs 65 out of 100

Start here

The best non-toxic sports performance undergarments, ranked by grade

See the picks →

Buyer’s guide

What to look for in sports performance undergarments, and which brands grade best and worst

Read →

Why PUMA Women's Quarter Crew Socks (6 Pairs) grades highest here, and why that is not a pass

Every grade on this page is one sum. A category starts from a baseline, each disclosed material or coating adds risk points, and each thing the brand or a third party has published takes them away. Below is that sum for the winner, then for 2 products it beats, so you can see exactly where the 45 points between the top and the bottom of this sports performance undergarments ranking come from. Nothing in this category reaches our 70 point pass mark, so this is the shape of the field rather than a recommendation.

Top graded, and still below our pass mark

PUMA Women's Quarter Crew Socks (6 Pairs)
65Good
PUMA Women's Quarter Crew Socks (6 Pairs)

Made of Cotton/polyester blend socks, no waterproofing.

  • +30Category baseline. The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
  • +15No PFAS disclosure. No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
  • -10Base material not linked to PFAS. The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

35risk points in total, which is a grade of 65

What the grade does not fix. It still carries one risk factor, No PFAS disclosure, and our graders recorded 3 other hazards on it. See the full breakdown.

What it still grades above, and why

Feetures High Performance Ultra Light No-Show Tab
20Bad45 points behind the winner
Feetures High Performance Ultra Light No-Show Tab

What puts it behind. Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment, +35 points. Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS. The top-graded product carries no such factor.

Made of Nylon blend with moisture-wicking treatment.

  • +35Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
  • +30Category baseline
  • +15No PFAS disclosure

80risk points, a grade of 20

Fruit of the Loom Men's Quick Dry & Moisture Wicking 360 Stretch Performance Boxer Briefs
20Bad45 points behind the winner
Fruit of the Loom Men's Quick Dry & Moisture Wicking 360 Stretch Performance Boxer Briefs

What puts it behind. Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment, +35 points. Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS. The top-graded product carries no such factor.

Made of Polyester/nylon blend with moisture-wicking treatment.

  • +35Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
  • +30Category baseline
  • +15Vague safety claims only. Uses vague language ("eco-friendly", "clean") without a specific PFAS statement.

80risk points, a grade of 20

No product on this page was physically tested by us. Every number above comes from published materials, ingredient and coating disclosures, certifications and brand statements, scored on one public rubric. Formulations change without notice, so check the current product listing before buying.

Which sports performance undergarments contain PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

  • Cotton/polyester blend socks, no waterproofing
  • Azo dyes

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • 100% cotton
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and residual dye chemicals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Supima cotton, no surface treatment disclosed
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Formaldehyde / VOCs

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Cotton/polyester blend, no stated water-resistant treatment
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes (color fastness and migration)

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Fruit of the Loom Men's Breathable Mesh Boxer Briefs

Fruit of the Loom

Men's Breathable Mesh Boxer Briefs

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Cotton and polyester blend, uncoated
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • cotton, elastane blend, uncoated fabric
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Formaldehyde / VOCs

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
PUMA Men's 6 Pack 1/2 Terry Socks

Puma

Men's 6 Pack 1/2 Terry Socks

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Cotton blend terry cloth
  • Antimony in polyester

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Smartwool Run Pattern Crew Socks 3-Pack

Smartwool

Run Pattern Crew Socks 3-Pack

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Merino wool blend, no water repellent finish
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Antimony in polyester

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Under Armour Men's 3-Pack Performance Cotton Boxerjock

Under Armour

Men's 3-Pack Performance Cotton Boxerjock

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Cotton blend with elastane
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Fruit of the Loom Men's 3 Pack Breathable Mesh Boxer Briefs

Fruit of the Loom

Men's 3 Pack Breathable Mesh Boxer Briefs

65GoodPFAS grade
  • cotton/polyester blend, breathable mesh
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes (synthetic colorants)

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • polyester and elastane blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microplastic shedding (polyester fiber fragmentation)

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Brooks Women's Chaser Padded Running Bra

Brooks

Women's Chaser Padded Running Bra

65GoodPFAS grade
  • nylon, polyester, elastane blend
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Elastane (spandex) degradation and microfiber release

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Nylon, spandex blend fabric
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Synthetic fiber shedding and microplastic release
Find an alternative on Amazon
Brooks Women's PR Elite Bra

Brooks

Women's PR Elite Bra

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Nylon, spandex blend with mesh
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Cotton blend with elastic/polyester, moisture-wicking treatment unspecified
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • cotton/polyester blend, breathable knit
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • cotton/synthetic blend, no stated treatment
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • polyester/elastane blend, moisture-wicking synthetic
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dye residues

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Cotton blend, elastane stretch
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Residual dyes or chemical finishes from manufacturing

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • polyester blend, moisture-wicking synthetic fabric
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes in synthetic textiles

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Polyester blend, moisture-wicking, no disclosed coating
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes (azo colorants)

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Merino wool blend, nylon, elastane
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes in textile coloring

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
Feetures High Performance Cushion No Show Tab

Feetures

High Performance Cushion No Show Tab

65GoodPFAS grade
  • Acrylic blend sock with no disclosed treatments
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes in synthetic fibers

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Merino wool blend, synthetic fibers
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Microplastics
Find an alternative on Amazon

Get the graded list, free.

The products we score each week, and the best-graded alternative in every category.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.