Ceramic Non-stick vs 8in Charcoal Aluminum Nonstick Fry Pan: which is safer?
GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick is the clear pick. Imusa 8in Charcoal Aluminum Nonstick Fry Pan carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
GreenPan
Ceramic Non-stick
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleCoating degradation and integrity loss
PossibleAluminum leaching
PossibleMicroparticle shedding from coating
Imusa
8in Charcoal Aluminum Nonstick Fry Pan
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleTeflon-type coating fume risk (unconfirmed coating type)
PossibleAluminum leaching
LikelyCoating degradation and migration
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Coating degradation and integrity loss and Microparticle shedding from coating on the GreenPan and not on the Imusa.
- We flag PTFE fume risk (unconfirmed coating type), Coating degradation and migration and Lack of manufacturer transparency on chemical composition on the Imusa and not on the GreenPan.
- Both carry a flag for Aluminum leaching, so neither choice avoids it.
- The gap is 75 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the GreenPan is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Imusa grade, at 35% confidence against 100%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cookware: see the full ranking