Ceramic Non-stick vs Neoflam 11" Nonstick Frying Pan: which is safer?
GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick is the clear pick. Neoflam 11" Nonstick Frying Pan carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
GreenPan
Ceramic Non-stick
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleCoating degradation and integrity loss
PossibleAluminum leaching
PossibleMicroparticle shedding from coating
Neelam Foodland
Neoflam 11" Nonstick Frying Pan
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleTeflon-type coating fume risk (thermal degradation)
PossibleAluminum substrate leaching
PossibleCoating degradation and microflake release
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Coating degradation and integrity loss, Aluminum leaching and Microparticle shedding from coating on the GreenPan and not on the Neelam Foodland.
- We flag PTFE fume risk (thermal degradation), Aluminum substrate leaching, Coating degradation and microflake release and Inadequate safety documentation on the Neelam Foodland and not on the GreenPan.
- The gap is 75 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the GreenPan is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Neelam Foodland grade, at 35% confidence against 100%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cookware: see the full ranking