PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Neoflam 11" Nonstick Frying Pan

Neelam Foodland · Cookware

Neoflam 11" Nonstick Frying Pan

Bad

Skip until Neoflam discloses the coating type.

Verdict: SkipCoating type undisclosed by Neelam Foodland; PFAS risk cannot be assessed. No independent safety data available for this brand.

Neoflam hasn't published information about what the nonstick coating is made of. Without confirmation that it avoids Teflon-type coating or PFAS, the risk stays unknown.

The safe swap

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nonstick coating, type unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (thermal degradation)

If the coating is Teflon-type coating-based and lacks explicit safe-use labeling, heating above 500F may release fumes that cause polymer fume fever. Coating type is unspecified, so this risk cannot be ruled out.

70/ 100
🔩

Aluminum substrate leaching

If the pan body is bare or partially exposed aluminum (common in budget nonstick cookware), acidic foods may cause micro-leaching of aluminum. No coating durability data is available for this product.

70/ 100
🍂

Coating degradation and microflake release

Nonstick coatings degrade with use and abuse. Without specifications on coating thickness, bonding method, or lifespan, you cannot predict when this pan will begin flaking or require replacement.

70/ 100
⚠️

Inadequate safety documentation

The brand's failure to disclose coating chemistry, certifications, or care limits is itself a hazard: you cannot make informed decisions about safe use temperature, cleaning methods, or replacement timing.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No recalls or test results document lead or cadmium in Neelam Foodland cookware. However, budget cookware manufacturing sometimes uses lower-grade metals in handles and fasteners; independent testing would be needed to confirm absence.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Neoflam 11 uses an unspecified nonstick coating, which is a critical gap. Nonstick cookware typically relies on either Teflon-type coating-based polymers (like Teflon) or ceramic/mineral alternatives; the choice determines thermal stability and fume risk. Without disclosure from Neelam Foodland, you cannot know whether this pan poses Teflon-type coating off-gassing risk above 500F or contains legacy fluorinated compounds. The substrate material (aluminum, stainless steel, or hybrid) is also unknown, affecting leaching potential.

The brand's record and disclosure

Neelam Foodland has not publicly disclosed coating chemistry, manufacturing certifications, or third-party safety testing for this model. No independent recalls, lawsuits, or safety complaints were found in public records for this specific product. The brand's silence on PFAS chemistry and regulatory compliance is a red flag; established cookware makers routinely publish safety data sheets and certification status (NSF, FDA compliance statements). This lack of transparency is not evidence of danger, but it blocks informed assessment.

How it compares in its category

Major nonstick cookware brands (T-fal, Calphalon, Our Place, GreenPan) provide explicit coating specifications and third-party testing results. Premium ceramic-coated pans often advertise PFOA-free status; Teflon-type coating-based competitors like Teflon publish degradation temperature data. The Neoflam 11 offers none of this. For the price point (unknown here), you could choose brands with transparent safety profiles and available warranty terms, reducing guesswork about coating durability and fume risk.

If you buy it

Contact Neelam Foodland directly to request the coating type, PFOA/Teflon-type coating status, and safe maximum heating temperature before purchase. Hand-wash only to preserve the coating; never use metal utensils or high heat (above 400F is often safer for most nonstick pans). Replace immediately if the coating shows bubbling, peeling, or scratches that expose substrate. If you observe any unusual smell when heating, discontinue use; this may indicate polymer breakdown.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Neelam Foodland has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Cookware

GreenPan Ceramic Non-stick

GreenPan

Ceramic Non-stick

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Coating degradation and integrity loss

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

Scanpan Ceramic Titanium

Scanpan

Ceramic Titanium

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🔩

Ceramic coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic or particulate shedding from coating

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

GreenPan Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

GreenPan

Chatham Ceramic Nonstick Frypan Set

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Ceramic coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Thermal shock and handle integrity

Limited concern

70

Low risk, safe to use.

Risky category by default

More cookware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.