Mens Yukon vs Men Mephisto Curt Mt SNEAKER: which is safer?
Men Mephisto Curt Mt SNEAKER is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Hanwag
Mens Yukon
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
leather upper, rubber sole, waterproof treatment (type unspecified)
Confidence
35%
LikelyPFAS in waterproof treatment (documented separately but included for context)
PossibleChromium tanning residues in leather
PossibleAzo dyes and colorants in leather and rubber
Our pick
Mephisto
Men Mephisto Curt Mt SNEAKER
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
leather, textile, rubber sole
Confidence
55%
PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing from adhesives
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in waterproof treatment (documented separately but included for context), Chromium tanning residues in leather, Azo dyes and colorants in leather and rubber and Coating degradation and waterproofing loss over time on the Hanwag and not on the Mephisto.
- We flag Volatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing from adhesives on the Mephisto and not on the Hanwag.
- The Hanwag is leather upper, rubber sole, waterproof treatment (type unspecified) where the Mephisto is leather, textile, rubber sole, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Mephisto is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof boots: see the full ranking