s Contessa Shiloh vs Thomasville Slide Jack Sleeper Sofa: which is safer?
Thomasville Slide Jack Sleeper Sofa is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Haverty
s Contessa Shiloh
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
LikelyFlame retardants (brominated or phosphorus-based)
ReportedVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) and off-gassing
PossibleFormaldehyde in fabric resins and dyes
Our pick
Thomasville Furniture
Thomasville Slide Jack Sleeper Sofa
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleFlame retardants (chemical identity unknown)
PossibleFormaldehyde in adhesives and resins
LikelyVolatile organic compounds (VOC) from padding, fabric dyes, and finishes
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Flame retardants (brominated or phosphorus-based), Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and off-gassing, Formaldehyde in fabric resins and dyes and Polyurethane foam degradation over time on the Haverty and not on the Thomasville Furniture.
- We flag Flame retardants (chemical identity unknown), Formaldehyde in adhesives and resins and Volatile organic compounds (VOC) from padding, fabric dyes, and finishes on the Thomasville Furniture and not on the Haverty.
- The Haverty is upholstered furniture, likely polyester/poly blend fabric where the Thomasville Furniture is upholstered sofa, typically fabric or microfiber, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More upholstered furniture: see the full ranking