Slow Cooking Liners vs 20 Count Disposable Slow Cooker Liners and Cooking Bags: which is safer?

Slow Cooking Liners is the clear pick. 20 Count Disposable Slow Cooker Liners and Cooking Bags carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

Slow Cooking Liners

If You Care

Slow Cooking Liners

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 88/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Unbleached parchment paper

Confidence

78%

PossibleThermal degradation and smoke at high heat

PossibleMold or bacterial growth if stored wet or damp

PossibleAdhesion failure and paper fragments in food

20 Count Disposable Slow Cooker Liners and Cooking Bags

Kroger

20 Count Disposable Slow Cooker Liners and Cooking Bags

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Plastic (likely PE/PP) with grease-resistant coating

Confidence

45%

PossibleGrease-resistant coating composition (PFAS risk)

PossibleCoating degradation under heat stress

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Thermal degradation and smoke at high heat, Mold or bacterial growth if stored wet or damp and Adhesion failure and paper fragments in food on the If You Care and not on the Kroger.
  • We flag Grease-resistant coating composition (PFAS risk) and Coating degradation under heat stress on the Kroger and not on the If You Care.
  • The If You Care is Unbleached parchment paper where the Kroger is Plastic (likely PE/PP) with grease-resistant coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 80 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the If You Care is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Kroger grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More slow cooker liners: see the full ranking