Ultra Thin Heavy Pads with Wings vs O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad: which is safer?

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad is the clear pick. Kotex Ultra Thin Heavy Pads with Wings carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Kotex Ultra Thin Heavy Pads with Wings

Kotex

Ultra Thin Heavy Pads with Wings

PFAS grade

Poor 25/100

Overall grade

Bad 21/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Cellulose, synthetic absorbent core, polypropylene layers, waterproof backing

Confidence

52%

PossibleWaterproof backing (PFAS precursor concern)

Our pick

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

OB

O.b Pro Comfort Super Plus 16 pad

PFAS grade

Good 70/100

Overall grade

Good 52/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

rayon/viscose, cotton, and gelling polymers

Confidence

78%

PossibleMicroplastic shedding or degradation

ReportedIrritation or allergic sensitization from adhesive or synthetic fibers

PossibleBacterial growth or contamination from prolonged moisture

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Waterproof backing (PFAS precursor concern) on the Kotex and not on the OB.
  • We flag Microplastic shedding or degradation, Irritation or allergic sensitization from adhesive or synthetic fibers and Bacterial growth or contamination from prolonged moisture on the OB and not on the Kotex.
  • The Kotex is Cellulose, synthetic absorbent core, polypropylene layers, waterproof backing where the OB is rayon/viscose, cotton, and gelling polymers, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the OB is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Kotex grade, at 52% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More period pads: see the full ranking