TX5 GTX Men's vs Men's SFB 6" Shoes Golden Beige/Golden Beige/Sail: which is safer?
La Sportiva TX5 GTX Men's is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
La Sportiva
TX5 GTX Men's
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 8/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
synthetic textile with Gore-Tex membrane waterproof layer
Confidence
45%
PossibleAzo dyes
PossibleFormaldehyde-releasing resins in finishing
PossibleAntimony in polyester
Nike
Men's SFB 6" Shoes Golden Beige/Golden Beige/Sail
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 5
Material
Nylon mesh and synthetic uppers with water-repellent coating
Confidence
45%
LikelyPFAS in water-repellent coating
PossibleFormaldehyde resins in textile finishing
PossibleAzo dyes in synthetic materials
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Azo dyes, Formaldehyde-releasing resins in finishing and Antimony in polyester on the La Sportiva and not on the Nike.
- We flag PFAS in DWR coating, Formaldehyde resins in textile finishing, Azo dyes in synthetic materials and Adhesive and sole leachables on the Nike and not on the La Sportiva.
- The La Sportiva is synthetic textile with Gore-Tex membrane waterproof layer where the Nike is Nylon mesh and synthetic uppers with DWR coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof boots: see the full ranking