Long Hauler Duffel Expedition Bag vs Base Camp Dry Bag: which is safer?

Marmot Long Hauler Duffel Expedition Bag is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Marmot Long Hauler Duffel Expedition Bag

Marmot

Long Hauler Duffel Expedition Bag

PFAS grade

Poor 40/100

Overall grade

Poor 32/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment

Confidence

35%

Possiblewater-repellent coating chemistry (non-PFAS)

PossibleNylon fiber shedding (microplastics)

The North Face Base Camp Dry Bag

The North Face

Base Camp Dry Bag

PFAS grade

Poor 40/100

Overall grade

Bad 18/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

TPE/PVC drybag with waterproof coating

Confidence

45%

Possiblewater-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

PossiblePVC/TPE thermal leaching

ReportedCoating degradation and microparticle shedding

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR coating chemistry (non-PFAS) and Nylon fiber shedding (microplastics) on the Marmot and not on the The North Face.
  • We flag Durable Water Repellent (DWR) coating composition, PVC/TPE thermal leaching, Coating degradation and microparticle shedding and Seal seam integrity and off-gassing on the The North Face and not on the Marmot.
  • The Marmot is Nylon with DWR (durable water repellent) treatment where the The North Face is TPE/PVC drybag with waterproof coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof outdoor gear storage bags: see the full ranking