Men Mephisto Curt Mt SNEAKER vs Men's Hedgehog 3 Mid Waterproof Hiking: which is safer?
Men Mephisto Curt Mt SNEAKER is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Mephisto
Men Mephisto Curt Mt SNEAKER
PFAS grade
Good 65/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
leather, textile, rubber sole
Confidence
55%
PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing from adhesives
The North Face
Men's Hedgehog 3 Mid Waterproof Hiking
PFAS grade
Bad 20/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Textile upper with water-repellent coating waterproof treatment
Confidence
35%
LikelyPFAS in water-repellent coating waterproof coating
PossibleFormaldehyde-releasing resins in textile finish or adhesives
ReportedMicrofiber shedding from synthetic textile upper
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Volatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing from adhesives on the Mephisto and not on the The North Face.
- We flag PFAS in DWR waterproof coating, Formaldehyde-releasing resins in textile finish or adhesives and Microfiber shedding from synthetic textile upper on the The North Face and not on the Mephisto.
- The Mephisto is leather, textile, rubber sole where the The North Face is Textile upper with DWR waterproof treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Mephisto is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof boots: see the full ranking