Basic Mid-Rise Brief Black vs Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief: which is safer?

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief is the clear pick. Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Brief Black carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Brief Black

Modibodi

Basic Mid-Rise Brief Black

PFAS grade

Poor 25/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Organic cotton with waterproof leak-proof lining

Confidence

35%

PossibleWaterproof lining composition (non-PFAS)

PossibleMicroorganism growth if improperly dried

LikelyCoating degradation over repeated washing

Our pick

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

Modibodi

Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

PFAS grade

Excellent 100/100

Overall grade

Excellent 92/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

organic cotton blend with water-resistant coating

Confidence

85%

PossibleWater-resistant coating degradation

PossibleMicrobial growth and odor with improper care

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Waterproof lining composition (non-PFAS), Microorganism growth if improperly dried, Coating degradation over repeated washing and Contact dermatitis or skin irritation on the Modibodi and not on the Modibodi.
  • We flag Water-resistant coating degradation and Microbial growth and odor with improper care on the Modibodi and not on the Modibodi.
  • The Modibodi is Organic cotton with waterproof leak-proof lining where the Modibodi is organic cotton blend with water-resistant coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 75 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Modibodi is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Modibodi grade, at 35% confidence against 85%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More period underwear: see the full ranking