PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Brief Black

Modibodi · Period Underwear

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Brief Black

Poor

Waterproof period underwear; PFAS risk unknown, brand silent on treatment.

Verdict: SkipOrganic cotton base is lower-risk, but waterproof lining PFAS status unknown and brand opaque on treatment; verify care instructions and replace if degradation occurs.

Modibodi's leak-proof brief likely uses a waterproof barrier coating to contain fluids, but the brand does not disclose whether PFAS-based water-repellent coating treatments were applied. No third-party testing or PFAS claims found.

The safe swap

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

Lola

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Organic cotton with waterproof leak-proof lining

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

period care is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The polymer or coating layer is not disclosed; it may contain acrylate-based, polyurethane, or other synthetic chemicals that could leach into sensitive skin contact zones. Without brand transparency or testing, residual monomers or plasticizers cannot be ruled out.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

Microorganism growth if improperly dried

The waterproof barrier can trap moisture if the product is stored damp or laundered in high-heat dryers. This creates a microenvironment for bacterial or fungal growth on a product in direct contact with mucous membranes and open skin.

70/ 100

Coating degradation over repeated washing

Polymer or laminate waterproof linings degrade with age and heat exposure. As the coating fails, small particles or leachates may be released, and effectiveness diminishes, but safety data on coating breakdown byproducts is not published by the brand.

20/ 100
⚠️

Contact dermatitis or skin irritation

Synthetic lining chemicals or undisclosed finish residues on organic cotton may trigger allergic contact dermatitis, particularly in individuals with sensitive skin or vulvovaginal sensitivity. No ingredient list for the waterproof layer is available to screen for known allergens.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Dye or finish residues on organic cotton

Organic cotton eliminates pesticide risk but does not guarantee absence of azo dyes or formaldehyde resins used in printing or dyeing. Modibodi does not publish dye safety standards or ISO 14001 certification for this product line.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Modibodi Basic briefs use organic cotton as the primary fabric, which eliminates pesticide residues from conventional cotton but does not guarantee safety of the waterproof lining layer. The leak-proof barrier is the critical component and its chemical composition (likely a polymer coating or laminate) is not disclosed by the brand. Waterproofing in period underwear typically relies on synthetic treatments, and the specific chemistry here is opaque, making independent assessment of non-PFAS chemical leaching difficult.

The brand's record and disclosure

Modibodi is silent on PFAS treatment and provides no published testing or third-party certification for chemical content in their waterproof layers. The brand does not disclose whether their lining uses PFC-free alternatives, traditional Teflon-type coating-based coatings, or other polymer barriers. No major recalls or safety controversies are on public record for this product line, but the lack of transparency on the lining chemistry is a red flag for informed purchasing.

How it compares in its category

Period underwear without disclosed waterproofing chemistry sits in a murky middle ground. Brands like Aisle and Knix have published commitments to PFAS-free materials and third-party testing; Modibodi does not. Versus disposable pads or tampons, reusable period underwear reduces plastic waste but shifts chemical risk to the durable coating. Organic cotton construction is a relative plus, but the barrier layer is where hazard concentration typically occurs.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and dry flat; heat may accelerate degradation of the waterproof lining and increase leaching. Inspect the lining annually for cracking, peeling, or odor changes; replace if degradation is visible. Avoid prolonged storage in sealed plastic bags, as trapped moisture can promote microbial growth and chemical off-gassing. Consider requesting the brand's material safety data sheet (MSDS) for the lining before purchase if chemical sensitivity is a concern.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Modibodi has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Period Underwear

Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

Modibodi

Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief

organic cotton blend with water-resistant coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent

Water-resistant coating degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth and odor with improper care

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. MADE SAFE certified, PFAS-free claimed and tested.

MADE SAFE

Lab test found no PFAS

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

Lola

The Lola High Waist Period Underwear

organic cotton with water-resistant treatment

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🫧

Water-resistant coating degradation and microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Allergen sensitivity to cotton or treatment additives

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; PFAS-free certified, organic cotton base.

MADE SAFE CertifiedOEKO-TEX Standard 100

Lab test found no PFAS

Organic Cotton Period Underwear

Lola

Organic Cotton Period Underwear

organic cotton with gusseted absorbent layer

PFAS Grade70Good
Overall Grade58Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes and color fastness

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Organic cotton core, no water-resistant treatment disclosed.

Risky category by default

More period underwear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.