Men's Mesh 5 No Fly Boxer Brief vs Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack: which is safer?

Reebok Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

New Balance Men's Mesh 5 No Fly Boxer Brief

New Balance

Men's Mesh 5 No Fly Boxer Brief

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 47/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Mesh polyester, elastane blend

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes (allergenic colorants)

PossibleAntimony (polyester catalyst residue)

ReportedMicrofiber shedding (synthetic fiber release during wear and wash)

Our pick

Reebok Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

Reebok

Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

nylon, spandex, cotton blend

Confidence

72%

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in fabric finishing

PossibleAzo dyes

PossibleElastomer degradation (spandex breakdown)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes (allergenic colorants), Antimony (polyester catalyst residue) and Microfiber shedding (synthetic fiber release during wear and wash) on the New Balance and not on the Reebok.
  • We flag Formaldehyde resins in fabric finishing, Azo dyes and Elastomer degradation (spandex breakdown) on the Reebok and not on the New Balance.
  • The New Balance is Mesh polyester, elastane blend where the Reebok is nylon, spandex, cotton blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More sports performance undergarments: see the full ranking