Waterproofing Wax for Leather vs Surface Protectant Aerosol Can PK12: which is safer?

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Nikwax Waterproofing Wax for Leather

Nikwax

Waterproofing Wax for Leather

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 51/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

wax-based waterproofing

Confidence

78%

PossibleRespiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application

ReportedPFAS in water repellency treatment

ZEP Surface Protectant Aerosol Can PK12

Zep

Surface Protectant Aerosol Can PK12

PFAS grade

Good 50/100

Overall grade

Bad 4/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 5

Material

aerosol formulation, unspecified coating/protectant

Confidence

35%

PossiblePFAS in fluorocarbon-based fabric coatings

ReportedInhalation hazard from aerosolized propellants and coating mist

LikelyVolatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Respiratory irritation or fume inhalation during application and PFAS in water repellency treatment on the Nikwax and not on the Zep.
  • We flag PFAS in fluorocarbon-based fabric coatings, Inhalation hazard from aerosolized propellants and coating mist, Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing and Skin and eye contact irritation on the Zep and not on the Nikwax.
  • The Nikwax is wax-based waterproofing where the Zep is aerosol formulation, unspecified coating/protectant, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • We are less certain about the Zep grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More fabric stain guard sprays: see the full ranking