Crispi 4-in-1 Portable Glass Air Fryer Cooking System vs Dual Easy Fry Air Fryer 8.3 L: which is safer?
Ninja Crispi 4-in-1 Portable Glass Air Fryer Cooking System is the clear pick. Tefal Dual Easy Fry Air Fryer 8.3 L carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
Ninja
Crispi 4-in-1 Portable Glass Air Fryer Cooking System
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleThermal fracture or stress in glass cooking vessel
PossiblePlastic housing off-gassing (VOCs and formaldehyde)
PossibleElectrical hazard or heating element degradation
Tefal
Dual Easy Fry Air Fryer 8.3 L
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleTeflon-type coating thermal decomposition / fume risk
ReportedCoating degradation and microparticle release
PossibleAluminum substrate leaching (if present)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Thermal fracture or stress in glass cooking vessel, Plastic housing off-gassing (VOCs and formaldehyde) and Electrical hazard or heating element degradation on the Ninja and not on the Tefal.
- We flag PTFE thermal decomposition / fume risk, Coating degradation and microparticle release, Aluminum substrate leaching (if present) and PFAS in manufacturing or coat precursors on the Tefal and not on the Ninja.
- The Ninja is Glass cooking vessel with stainless steel and plastic components where the Tefal is PTFE nonstick coating (Teflon-type) on air fryer cooking surfaces, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 70 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Ninja is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More air fryers: see the full ranking