Men Oakley Mthod Insulated Jacket vs Women's Untracked Jacket: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Men Oakley Mthod Insulated Jacket

Oakley

Men Oakley Mthod Insulated Jacket

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

polyester/nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment

Confidence

45%

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal colorants

PossibleAntimony in polyester

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from degraded coating

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

PFAS grade

Poor 35/100

Overall grade

Bad 17/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

Confidence

42%

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating finish

ReportedMicroplastics shedding from polyester

PossibleCoating degradation and leaching

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and heavy metal colorants, Antimony in polyester, Microplastic shedding from degraded coating and DWR coating degradation and chemical release timing on the Oakley and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag PFAS in DWR finish, Microplastics shedding from polyester and Coating degradation and leaching on the Patagonia and not on the Oakley.
  • The Oakley is polyester/nylon with DWR water-repellent treatment where the Patagonia is recycled polyester with DWR treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More ski & snowboard jackets: see the full ranking