Dry Dog Food Original vs Adult Dry Dog Food Lamb & Rice 5 lb: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Orijen
Dry Dog Food Original
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 62/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
dry kibble in paper/kraft bag
Confidence
72%
PossiblePFAS in packaging (bag material/inks)
PossibleOxidative rancidity in fat during storage
Purina Pro Plan
Adult Dry Dog Food Lamb & Rice 5 lb
PFAS grade
Good 70/100
Overall grade
Good 62/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
paper/kraft outer bag with likely polyethylene inner lining (food contact)
Confidence
72%
PossibleMineral oil or ink migration from paper
PossibleMold or bacterial growth from moisture ingress
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PFAS in packaging (bag material/inks) and Oxidative rancidity in fat during storage on the Orijen and not on the Purina Pro Plan.
- We flag Mineral oil or ink migration from paper and Mold or bacterial growth from moisture ingress on the Purina Pro Plan and not on the Orijen.
- The Orijen is dry kibble in paper/kraft bag where the Purina Pro Plan is paper/kraft outer bag with likely polyethylene inner lining (food contact), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More pet food bags: see the full ranking