Pro-V Daily Moisture Renewal Conditioner vs Acidic Grow Full System Densifying Conditioner: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Pantene
Pro-V Daily Moisture Renewal Conditioner
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
aqueous conditioning cream; typical surfactants, silicones, emollients
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens
PossibleSilicone buildup (cosmetic, not toxicological)
Redken
Acidic Grow Full System Densifying Conditioner
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
aqueous conditioning emulsion with polymers and silicones
Confidence
72%
PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitizers
Possible1,4-dioxane contamination (residual from synthesis)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Fragrance allergens and Silicone buildup (cosmetic, not toxicological) on the Pantene and not on the Redken.
- We flag Fragrance allergens and sensitizers and 1,4-dioxane contamination (residual from synthesis) on the Redken and not on the Pantene.
- The Pantene is aqueous conditioning cream; typical surfactants, silicones, emollients where the Redken is aqueous conditioning emulsion with polymers and silicones, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More conditioner: see the full ranking