PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
Redken Acidic Grow Full System Densifying Conditioner

Redken · Conditioner

Redken Acidic Grow Full System Densifying Conditioner

Excellent

Low-Medium risk. Rinse-off formula with no known PFAS triggers.

Verdict · BuyRinse-off conditioner with standard polymer-silicone base, no established hazards beyond typical category risks; PFAS concern lower for this format.

This rinse-off conditioner uses typical polymers and silicones without waterproofing, grease-resistant coatings, or nonstick treatments where PFAS appear. Redken makes no public PFAS claims but the ingredient type keeps this product in lower-concern range.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

aqueous conditioning emulsion with polymers and silicones

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Redken Acidic Grow Full System Conditioner is made of, ingredients and materials

Redken Acidic Grow conditioner is a water-based emulsion combining silicones (for slip and shine), cationic polymers (for conditioning deposit), and humectants typical of mainstream salon conditioners. The 'acidic' formulation refers to pH tuning to close hair cuticles, not a hazardous acid concentration. No reported use of Teflon-type coating, waxes, or metallic compounds that would trigger acute toxicity concerns in a rinse-off product.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Redken Acidic Grow contains fragrance as listed ingredient; no specific allergen declaration on standard labeling. Individual sensitivity varies; patch testing recommended for those with known fragrance intolerance or sensitive scalp.

70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane contamination (residual from synthesis)

Surfactants and emulsifiers used in conditioners can carry trace 1,4-dioxane as manufacturing byproduct. Redken does not publicly disclose testing or removal protocols. Risk is low in rinse-off format, but not independently verified for this specific product.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No documented use of formaldehyde-releasing preservatives in current Redken Acidic Grow formulations. Standard industry practice favors lower-concern alternatives; no recalls or alerts on file for this product.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Conditioners do not typically employ pigments requiring heavy metal stabilizers. No published data suggests lead, cadmium, or arsenic in this product; regulatory compliance expected for mass-market salon brands.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Microplastic microbeads

Redken Acidic Grow does not list polyethylene or polypropylene microbeads as exfoliants. This is a conditioning emulsion, not a scrub or physical exfoliant product.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Redken is owned by L'Oreal and subject to EU cosmetic ingredient restrictions and voluntary US industry standards, but makes no public commitment to PFAS avoidance or independent third-party testing. The brand has no documented major recalls or chemical controversies specific to this product line. Full ingredient disclosure is available on pack and manufacturer websites, which is standard practice for the category.

How it compares in its category

This product sits in the mainstream premium segment, comparable to other salon-grade conditioners (Pantene Gold Series, SheaMoisture formulas) in composition and hazard profile. Rinse-off conditioners present lower exposure risk than leave-on products because contact time is brief and dilution occurs. No material advantage or disadvantage versus comparable mass-market or prestige alternatives in terms of established safety data.

If you buy it

Apply to damp hair, leave for 1-3 minutes, rinse thoroughly with water. Avoid contact with eyes and mucous membranes; rinse immediately if irritation occurs. Store at room temperature away from direct heat; do not apply to scalp or leave on skin. Discontinue use if rash, itching, or persistent irritation develops and consult a dermatologist.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Redken has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Redken Acidic Grow Full System Densifying Conditioner?

Avalon Organics

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avalon Organics

Rosemary Volumizing Conditioner

85ExcellentPFAS grade
  • water-based conditioner, typical surfactants and botanical extracts
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Heavy metals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More conditioner grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.