Men's M10 Anorak vs Women's Untracked Jacket: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Patagonia Men's M10 Anorak

Patagonia

Men's M10 Anorak

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Confidence

45%

PossibleHeavy metals in pigments and dyes

Reportedwater-repellent coating finish degradation and microrelease

LikelyNylon microfiber shedding during laundering

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

PFAS grade

Poor 35/100

Overall grade

Bad 17/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

Confidence

42%

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating finish

ReportedMicroplastics shedding from polyester

PossibleCoating degradation and leaching

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Heavy metals in pigments and dyes, DWR finish degradation and microrelease and Nylon microfiber shedding during laundering on the Patagonia and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag PFAS in DWR finish, Microplastics shedding from polyester and Coating degradation and leaching on the Patagonia and not on the Patagonia.
  • The Patagonia is Nylon with DWR (durable water repellent) finish where the Patagonia is recycled polyester with DWR treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More ski & snowboard jackets: see the full ranking