PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Patagonia Men's M10 Anorak

Patagonia · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Men's M10 Anorak

Bad

water-repellent coating treatment likely contains PFAS; Patagonia silent on composition.

Verdict: SkipNylon anorak with likely PFAS-based water-repellent coating; Patagonia has no published composition disclosure, but brand reputation for durability and repairability mitigates short-term replacement waste.

Patagonia M10 Anorak uses nylon with water-repellent finish typical of synthetic water-repellent coating coatings often containing PFAS. Brand makes no disclosure about PFAS content or alternatives used.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

Nylon fabrics can be colored with various dye classes. Patagonia's manufacturing audits and certifications do not specifically exclude or test for trace cadmium or lead in finished textiles for this model. Risk is low if sourced from regulated suppliers, but no third-party test data is public.

Source: FDA
70/ 100

water-repellent coating finish degradation and microrelease

water-repellent coating coatings degrade with wear and washing, shedding fine particulates into wash water and the environment. Whether this product sheds PFAS or other water-repellent coating-polymer fragments at higher rates than industry standard is not independently tested.

45/ 100
🫧

Nylon microfiber shedding during laundering

Synthetic nylon textiles release microfibers in wash cycles. This anorak, like all nylon garments, will shed fibers; the quantity and lifecycle impact are not quantified by Patagonia or independent labs for this specific model.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in nylon

Patagonia does not publicly disclose dye sourcing or azo restrictions for this product. Nylon dyeing can use azo compounds, but no independent testing or recalls specific to this anorak have been reported.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon does not require formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resist treatments. The water-repellent coating finish chemistry is proprietary and not disclosed; formaldehyde is unlikely but possible as a component in some industrial water-repellent coating formulations.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The M10 Anorak is constructed from nylon fabric treated with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. water-repellent coating treatments on nylon are typically applied as chemical coatings to create water beading and repellency without changing breathability. Nylon itself is a synthetic polymer that does not off-gas formaldehyde or volatile organics in normal wear, but the water-repellent coating finish is the primary chemical concern in this product's lifecycle.

The brand's record and disclosure

Patagonia has published environmental commitments and uses third-party certifications like the Responsible Wool Standard on some products, but does not publicly disclose water-repellent coating chemistry or PFAS content for this anorak. The brand has not released statements confirming fluorine-free water-repellent coating alternatives on nylon pieces, leaving composition opaque. Industry reporting indicates Patagonia has explored alternative water repellents but adoption across lines remains inconsistent and unannounced.

How it compares in its category

Most nylon rain jackets in this price and performance tier use water-repellent coating finishes, many with PFAS-based formulations. Some competitors (e.g., Arcteryx, The North Face) have begun labeling fluorine-free water-repellent coating options on specific models, whereas Patagonia offers no such transparency on the M10. The durability and repairability infrastructure Patagonia offers (Worn Wear program) does offset faster obsolescence compared to fast-fashion alternatives, reducing cumulative exposure per wear cycle.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently in cold water and air-dry; hot water and dryers can degrade water-repellent coating coatings and potentially mobilize residual finish chemicals. Do not dry-clean, as solvents may alter polymer structure. Reapply commercial water-repellent coating treatments sparingly, and research the formulation of any aftermarket product you use. The jacket's warranty and repair program make it a long-wear piece, so purchase assumes multi-year use to amortize embedded chemical exposure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Patagonia has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.