Women's Untracked Jacket vs Men's Copper Jacket: which is safer?

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

PFAS grade

Poor 35/100

Overall grade

Bad 17/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

Confidence

42%

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating finish

ReportedMicroplastics shedding from polyester

PossibleCoating degradation and leaching

Spyder Men's Copper Jacket

Spyder

Men's Copper Jacket

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 12/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Polyester with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Confidence

45%

PossiblePFAS in water-repellent coating water-repellent coating

PossibleCoating degradation and microplastic shedding

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag PFAS in DWR finish, Microplastics shedding from polyester and Coating degradation and leaching on the Patagonia and not on the Spyder.
  • We flag PFAS in DWR water-repellent coating and Coating degradation and microplastic shedding on the Spyder and not on the Patagonia.
  • The Patagonia is recycled polyester with DWR treatment where the Spyder is Polyester with DWR water-repellent finish, which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More ski & snowboard jackets: see the full ranking