PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Spyder Men's Copper Jacket

Spyder · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Spyder Men's Copper Jacket

Bad

Spyder does not disclose PFAS status. Typical water-repellent coating apparel risk remains unclear.

Verdict: SkipPolyester jacket with undisclosed water-repellent coating finish carries unclear PFAS risk; no brand transparency on chemical treatment. Wear with caution and launder carefully.

Spyder makes no public PFAS claims or disclosures for this jacket. Standard water-repellent coating coatings often contain PFAS, but Spyder's specific formulation is undisclosed.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

water-repellent coating finish composition is undisclosed by Spyder. Historically, many polyester apparel water-repellent coating treatments used perfluorinated compounds; modern alternatives exist but cannot be confirmed without brand transparency or independent testing.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microplastic shedding

As water-repellent coating wears and flakes off over time (especially after repeated washing), microscopic particles of the finish may shed. If the finish contains PFAS or other chemicals, this could contribute to microplastic and chemical exposure during wear and laundering.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in synthetic colorants

No specific records of restricted azo dyes in Spyder products, and copper/rust colorants are typically safe modern formulations. Standard polyester dyeing does not present a documented hazard for this brand.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony (a catalyst in polyester manufacture) is locked in the polymer matrix and does not leach under normal wearing or laundering conditions. No hazard reported for finished garments.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Modern polyester apparel typically uses minimal formaldehyde, and Spyder products do not carry documented formaldehyde warnings or recalls. This is a low-risk hazard class for contemporary polyester outerwear.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket is polyester with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. Polyester itself is a stable synthetic fiber with no inherent chemical hazard at normal wearing temperatures. However, water-repellent coating finishes are the concern: they are topical coatings designed to bead water away, and historically many contained PFAS (fluorinated compounds). Spyder does not publicly disclose whether their water-repellent coating treatment is PFAS-free or uses alternatives like paraffin or silicone-based repellents.

The brand's record and disclosure

Spyder, a ski and outdoor apparel company, maintains no public statement on PFAS use in their products and does not advertise PFAS-free certifications or material transparency on their website. The brand has not been flagged in major PFAS litigation or documented recalls, but the absence of disclosure is itself a red flag in an industry where leading competitors (e.g., Patagonia, The North Face) now offer PFAS-free or reduced-PFAS product lines. Without third-party testing or company commitment, water-repellent coating status on this jacket is unknowable.

How it compares in its category

Among polyester outerwear with water-repellent finishes, this jacket sits in the middle of the disclosure spectrum: better than bargain-bin brands with zero transparency, but behind competitors who explicitly test for or eliminate PFAS. Many mid-tier outdoor brands still use fluorinated water-repellent coating without labeling it, making this a typical rather than exceptional risk profile. If PFAS exposure is a priority, unfinished or wax-treated alternatives exist but are less common in ski wear.

If you buy it

Wash separately from other garments in cold water on gentle cycle, as water-repellent coating finishes can leach slightly during laundering, especially in hot water. Avoid dry cleaning, which may use solvents that can interact with water-repellent coating coatings. Expect the water-repellent finish to degrade after 20-40 washes; reapplication products exist (often also water-repellent coating-based, so same caveat applies). Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat to preserve the coating. If PFAS contamination concerns you, contact Spyder directly to request material safety data sheets (SDS) for the finish.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Spyder has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.