Tour Golf Glove - 6-Pack - Right Hand / Medium/Large vs Men's Profile Complete Golf Set: which is safer?

Wilson Men's Profile Complete Golf Set is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Ping Tour Golf Glove - 6-Pack - Right Hand / Medium/Large

Ping

Tour Golf Glove - 6-Pack - Right Hand / Medium/Large

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 59/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Leather and synthetic materials

Confidence

72%

PossibleHexavalent chromium in leather tanning residue

PossibleAzo dyes in synthetic backing or reinforcement

PossibleFormaldehyde resin in leather finishing

Our pick

Wilson Men's Profile Complete Golf Set

Wilson

Men's Profile Complete Golf Set

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips

Confidence

78%

PossibleGraphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure

PossibleRubber grip deterioration and skin contact

PossibleNickel or chromium sensitivity from steel clubheads

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Hexavalent chromium in leather tanning residue, Azo dyes in synthetic backing or reinforcement, Formaldehyde resin in leather finishing and Allergens from natural leather or synthetic backing on the Ping and not on the Wilson.
  • We flag Graphite shaft resin degradation and fiber exposure, Rubber grip deterioration and skin contact and Nickel or chromium sensitivity from steel clubheads on the Wilson and not on the Ping.
  • The Ping is Leather and synthetic materials where the Wilson is Steel clubheads, graphite shafts, rubber grips, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More golf balls & equipment: see the full ranking